Many
environmentally-conscious ads (or any social responsibility ads) run the risk
of being preachy-- shaming audiences turns them off. Studies that track
consumers’ eye movements have proved that people have begun to ignore the
graphic images of diseased organs on cigarette packs completely. Provocative
and abrasive are not as effective at changing behavior as they used to be,
which means organizations and ad campaigns need to be more thoughtful and
subtle in their work in order to persuade publics.
Shock value in ads (like the texting while driving
campaign or the Sarah Mclaughlin animal cruelty commercial) is effective at
getting attention, but people don’t like to think too much about what distresses
them. Comedy, however, isn’t threatening and has a lower risk of turning people
off than provocative messages. This is why Greenpeace Mexico’s campaign “Toxic
Rivers Tour” is effective; the humor of the ad caught my attention and made me
interested in what the organization was raising awareness about. The ad
presented polluted Mexican rivers as tourist destinations; the absurdity and
tongue-in-cheek dig at the country’s apathy towards conservation serve to include
everyone in on the joke, instead of shaming them. It’s easier to acknowledge
bad behavior when you can laugh at it, which then makes it easier to rectify
said conduct.
I judge an ad’s effectiveness by my willing to
learn more about the organization/product—right after I saw the ad I wanted to
look the campaign up online. But more than that, it’s a lesson for future PR
specialists such as myself: humor can go a long way. Shock value might be good
at raising awareness, but in order to really change behavior and attitudes,
laughter can sometimes be the best remedy.
No comments:
Post a Comment